Home | Contact Us | Site Map
    Profile   |   Campaigns   |   Media Centre   |   Photo Gallery  |   Finance   |   Downloads
Finance in Lok Sabha
MP Fund Utilization
Mumbai In Lok Sabha
Problems Of Mumbai
Railway Problems Of Mumbai
Social Contribution
Vikrant Bachao
Yuvak Pratishthan
Kirit Uncle's Kid's Corner
Important Links



Mithi Nadi HC Order 01.03.06 Statement

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIN

WRIT PETITION NO. 2116 OF 2005

 

 

Kirit Somaiya                                                                                     ..... Petitioner

 

            Versus        

                                       

State of Maharashtra and Ors.                                                        ..... Respondents

 

Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Counsel with Ms. Madhavi Diwan & Mr. D.H.Mehta l/b. M/s. Dhruva Liladhar & Co. for the petitioner.

Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General with Mr. K.R. Belosay, Assistant Government Pleader for respondet Nos. 1,2,5, and 10.

Mr. Rajshekahar Govilkar for the respondent  no. 8.

Mr. C.M. Lokesh for the respondent no.7.

Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Senior Counsel with Mrs. S.V. Bharucha for the respondent no.9.

 

                                      CORAM     :        R.M. LODHA &

                                                                ANOOP V MOHTA, JJ.

                                      DATED      :        1ST MARCH, 2006.

P.C.

          Pursuant to our order dated 22nd  February, 2006on behalf of Mithi River Development and Protection Authority (MRDPA), an affidavit has been field by its Member Secretary and Project Director Dr. Vikas Sadanand Tondawalkar.

2.            In his affidavit, the Project Director and Member-Secretary of MRDPA has stated that Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Mumbai was entrusted the work of development action of plan for the environmental improvement of Mithi river in its first meeting held on 1st September,  2005. For the purpose of carrying out the hydraulic studies, it was decided to entrust the said work to CWPRS, Khadakwasla. CWPRS submitted its final interim report in the month of January, 2006 and IIT, Mumbai submitted its final interim report o 23rd February, 2006. M/s Air-O-Cleen Associates were appointed to conduct the cadastral survey and flood mapping survey of the entire(1708 kms.) stretch of Mithi river form river from Mahim Causeway to its original Vihar Lake and (4 kms) Vakola Nalla from Bandra-Kurla Complex to Santacruz Airport. The details of the said survey were furnished to the IIT, Mumbai and CWRPS, Khadakwasala to facilitate them to make their reports. CWPRS, Khadakwasala  in its final interim report recommended to increase the carying capacity of the river by undertaking deepening and widening works. In he affidavit, he Project Director-cum Secretary has also stated that on behalf of MRDPAA, MMRDA has appointed IIT, Mumbai to conduct a base lines socio-economic survey for the entire Mithi river and Vakola Nalla. This was sought to be done with a view to identify the structures which would be affected by the widening of the river as per the recommendations of CWWPRS. This survey is independent to the survey that was carried out by the Collector, Mumbai Suburban District.

3.                As per survey conducted by the Collector, Mumbai Suburban District,3600 encroachers were found within 30 meters width on either side within the stretch from Mahim Causeway to CST Bridge and within the river basin beyond CST Bridge upto Vihar Lake. It is stated that the work of removal of these illegal encroachments and rehabilitation of project  affected persons would be completed as far as possible by 31st May, 2006.

4.                We may observe that the experience that the city had on 26th July, 2005, must open the eyes of the concerned authorities necessitating swift action and avoidance of past experience. In our view, in the light of the survey that has already been conducted, it should be the endeavor of the Collector, MSD to ensure accordingly and direct the Collector, Mumbai Suburban District to ensure the removal of 3600 encroachers having their structures within 30 meters width on either side of the river by 31st May, 2006 and that they are also rehabilitated by that date.

5.                As regards the unauthorised industrial units identified by Maharashtra Pollution Control Board, we direct the said Board to take appropriate action including the closure of these industrial units as early as possible.  Obviously, the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board shall observe the due process of law in that regard.

6.                We accept the proposal of MRDPA to implement the Mithi river development works in two phases.  As regards phase I, works which comprise of deepening, widening and desilting of Mithi river and resettlement and rehabilitation of project affected persons, we direct the entire work to be completed by 31st May, 2006.  It shall be for MRDPA to monitor and oversee the work of deepening, widening and desilting being done and executed by MMRDA and MCGM.

7.                We also accept the statement made by Project Director-Cum-Secretary that Phase II work shall be undertaken after the monsoon of 2006.  Phase II work shall comprise of pitching, construction of retaining wall, construction of service roads, land-scape development, beautification work on either side of the river alongwith additional widening works and deepening works.

8.                We record and accept the statement of Mr. K.K. Singhvi, the learned senior counsel for Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai that every day the garbage, solid waste etc. is removed from the entire stretch of Mithi river that falls within the jurisdiction of Municipal corporation.  He submits that he would satisfy us in this regard by placing the photographs taken that shall be taken tomorrow i.e., 2nd March, 2006 at 3.00 p.m. under the caption ‘For Direction’ to satisfy ourselves with regard to the statement made on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai by Mr. K.K. Singhvi as recorded above.

9.                In view of the statement made by Mr. Govilkar, the learned counsel for the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board that the power supply company viz; Reliance Energy Limited has been directed to disconnect the power supply to unauthorised industrial units, we direct the impleadment of the Reliance Energy Limited as party respondent.  Let notice be given to the Reliance Energy Limited.  Retuernable on 22nd March, 2006.

10.           At the cost of the petitioners, MRDPA is directed to furnish copies of final interim reports submitted by IIT, Mumbai, CWPRS, Khadakwasla.

                                                                                                                 Sd/-

(R.M. LODHA, J.)

                                                                                                                 Sd/-

                                                                                                      (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)

 


 

Download Acrobat
Site designed & maintained by WebPercept.com